Manufactured Epidemics: Fear, PCR, and the Vaccine Pipeline

Covid‑19? These new viruses? Something about "Fool me once…" comes to mind.

An "outbreak" that never had the potential to spread

None of the new viruses in the news have any epidemic potential without significant genetic manipulation and relentless media messaging implying that they have epidemic potential. There is no evidence that Andes hantavirus, the reported cause of the "outbreak" on a cruise ship, could spread in any meaningful way through the general public. It has been endemic in areas of Argentina for decades. It is highly resistant to human‑to‑human transmission, requiring close physical contact for many hours before transmission can happen.

Nevertheless, 18 passengers from the US who were simply on that ship were until very recently either held in quarantine or under 24/7 monitoring at their home, not allowed non‑essential travel and with mandated daily check‑ins.

Read that again. US citizens, whose only "crime" was being on a ship where cases (i.e. most simply tested PCR‑positive) of a non‑transmissible illness allegedly occurred, were being kept in isolation against their will and maintained under surveillance. This is only possible because the threat of contagion allows it to happen.

Not‑very‑transmissible viruses, very convenient vaccines

The same is true for those other two viral illnesses we are being led to believe have epidemic potential. Neither has ever been considered highly transmissible between humans, but you would never know that by listening to the media.

It should come as no surprise to anyone that Pfizer, Moderna, and the US government have all been working to develop vaccines against all three of these not‑very‑transmissible viruses for several years. A few of these vaccine candidates are now ready for Phase II clinical trials.

What a convenient coincidence. Just when the vaccine industry is ready to test their vaccines on large populations of people, three different diseases "prevented" by their vaccines explode into the news almost simultaneously.

PCR: the test that manufactures cases

One final note about these viral illnesses. Through several newsletters I've been warning that the test used to diagnose Covid‑19, called PCR, is absolutely not capable of diagnosing a viral infection. If PCR is used to diagnose any future "epidemic" viral disease, I have written, we can have a high degree of confidence that it is a manufactured epidemic. PCR as a diagnostic test is only ever used to inflate the number of "cases" reported in the media. A case simply means a positive PCR test.

And even in the few weeks it has taken me to start‑and‑finish this article there have been at least three new viruses said to be of concern as potential pandemic‑causing candidates. It's as though they want us to feel perpetually at risk.

How are all six of these infections I've mentioned — hantavirus, Ebola, Bundibugyo virus, H5N1 (bird flu), West Nile virus, and Marburg virus — being diagnosed? Yep, every one of them is "diagnosed" using PCR.

Fear was the mechanism, not the illness

I hope we can all now see that the mass vaccination campaign, the lockdowns and social distancing, and all those other mandates around C19 were absolutely not implemented by governments worldwide simultaneously in order to protect the global population. It was the fear and hysteria very intentionally generated around the risk of getting infected that allowed any of that to happen.

Trust is low. It should be lower.

Polls show that trust and confidence in both the public health institutions and the medical system is at an all‑time low.

I would say that however low it is now, it is not low enough.